FILE_EXIST condition issue

mrbdrm

Hey
i want to check if this behavior is normal
i have a process(process 2) that start from another process(process 1) rules.
on the process 2 i have a condition:
FILE_EXISTS('c:\PDFs<<OL.UID>>.pdf')='Yes'
now see the log image attached:
it seems that the value of <<OL.UID>> is appearing before the c:\

customaware

Haven't seen that before.

Try this....

FILE_EXISTS('c:\PDFs\'+ OL.UID +'.pdf')='Yes'

Can you try building the entire filepath string first in say a SystemsSettings attribute and then use that and see if it makes a difference.

SystemSettings.MyFilePath='c:\PDFs\'+ OL.UID +'.pdf'

FILE_EXISTS(SystemSettings.MyFilePath)='Yes'

BenHayat

eagles9999 wrote
Haven't seen that before.

Try this....

FILE_EXISTS('c:\PDFs\'+ OL.UID +'.pdf')='Yes'

Or

Can you try building the entire filepath string first in say a SystemsSettings attribute and then use that and see if it makes a difference.

SystemSettings.MyFilePath='c:\PDFs\'+ OL.UID +'.pdf'

FILE_EXISTS(SystemSettings.MyFilePath)='Yes'

Exactly!

hpl123

Is this bug possible only in the log viewer? Does the actual function work as it should?

mrbdrm

eagles9999 wrote
Haven't seen that before.

Try this....

FILE_EXISTS('c:\PDFs\'+ OL.UID +'.pdf')='Yes'

Or

Can you try building the entire filepath string first in say a SystemsSettings attribute and then use that and see if it makes a difference.

SystemSettings.MyFilePath='c:\PDFs\'+ OL.UID +'.pdf'

FILE_EXISTS(SystemSettings.MyFilePath)='Yes'

thanks eagles9999
your first suggestion worked but in the log the value was: c:\PDFs+8+.pdf
the second suggestion witch was adding the path to system setting did not work as AwareIM couldn't resolve the vale of OL.UID "Value of attribute FilePath of object SystemSettings could not be resolved"
it seems that AwareIM doubles the values inside the tags(eg 1 becomes 11) if you start a process from a process?

mrbdrm

hpl123 wrote
Is this bug possible only in the log viewer? Does the actual function work as it should?

i tasted it and it seems to be working correctly

BenHayat

mrbdrm wrote
hpl123 wrote
Is this bug possible only in the log viewer? Does the actual function work as it should?

i tasted it and it seems to be working correctly

Was it delicious? 😉

mrbdrm

BenHayat wrote
mrbdrm wrote
hpl123 wrote
Is this bug possible only in the log viewer? Does the actual function work as it should?

i tasted it and it seems to be working correctly

Was it delicious? 😉

haha
That is funny, wasn't paying enough attention 😃